Commit Reveal

How Commit Reveal conceals fresh validator weights before consensus so validators cannot simply copy the latest public weight matrix.

Commit Reveal

Commit Reveal is a Bittensor mechanism that delays public visibility of fresh validator weights. Validators still evaluate miners and submit weights, but when the mechanism is enabled those weights are concealed before they become visible inputs to yuma_consensus|Yuma Consensus.

References: Commit Reveal, Yuma Consensus

Why it exists

Validator weights are public once revealed because Bittensor needs transparent consensus and emission accounting. That transparency also creates the weight-copying problem: a validator can copy recent public weights instead of independently evaluating miners. Commit Reveal reduces that incentive by making copied weights stale before they can be reused.

References: Commit Reveal, The Weight Copying Problem

How the flow works

The normal validator action is still a weight submission. With Commit Reveal enabled, the chain commits an encrypted form of the submitted weights, waits through the configured concealment period, and then reveals the weights automatically when the required Drand beacon round is available. Revealed weights can then be processed by the consensus step.

Reference: Commit Reveal

Drand time-lock encryption

Commit Reveal uses Drand time-lock encryption so encrypted weights cannot be decrypted before the target reveal round. This removes the need for validators to manually reveal their own weights and prevents selective reveal behavior where a validator could decide whether to reveal after seeing how other weights affect consensus.

Reference: Commit Reveal

Subnet configuration

Subnet owners configure Commit Reveal with subnet hyperparameters. The official docs identify commit_reveal_weights_enabled as the switch that enables the mechanism and commit_reveal_period as the waiting period before weights are revealed. These values should be checked against the current subnet configuration before making operational decisions.

References: Commit Reveal, Subnet Hyperparameters

Practical implications

  • For validators: Honest, independent evaluation matters more when fresh weights are hidden from competitors.
  • For miners: Miner performance still has to be evaluated by validators before weights can be submitted.
  • For subnet owners: The reveal period should match how quickly the subnet’s miner quality signal changes. If the task is too static, stale copied weights may still be useful.
  • For readers: Commit Reveal is not a replacement for a strong incentive mechanism; it is a protection around how validator weights become public.

References: Commit Reveal, The Weight Copying Problem

Further Reading

Topics ConsensusValidation